This should be looked at seriously, but carefully, since the COMPAT_BUSTER
potential is huge.

From mystic@shadowlandz.esva.net  Sun Nov 10 21:56:25 1996
Received: from shadowlandz.esva.net by franck.Princeton.EDU via ESMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for <tim@franck.Princeton.EDU> id VAA25006; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 21:56:21 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by shadowlandz.esva.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA10104 for tim@franck.Princeton.EDU; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 22:00:13 -0500
From: mystic@shadowlandz.esva.net
Message-Id: <199611110300.WAA10104@shadowlandz.esva.net>
Subject: more little ideas
To: tim (Tim)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 21:59:59 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO



what do you think about changing query_ip_name, query_ip_number, and
query_ip_port to use current_object instead of command_giver?
(and anything else like that that uses this_player instead of this_object)


(sorry its just this little peant of a mail, but its all ideas i had :))
mark